psySC › Reading guides
Reading guide · Week 8 · the shame experiment
Johnson, E. A., & O'Brien, K. A. (2013)
Johnson, E. A., & O'Brien, K. A. (2013). Self-compassion soothes the savage ego-threat system: Effects on negative affect, shame, rumination, and depressive symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(9), 939–963.
Why you're reading this
Experimental evidence that writing to yourself compassionately about a shame event metabolizes it — against a strong comparison (expressive writing), with effects at follow-up.
How to read it (the roadmap)
Two studies; focus on the writing manipulation and the two-week follow-up. Know what the expressive-writing condition controls for (disclosure itself helps — so beating it matters).
Extract these — exam and discussion fuel
- The three conditions: self-compassionate writing vs. expressive writing vs. control
- Reduced shame and negative affect in the SC condition
- Less rumination at two-week follow-up
- Why beating EXPRESSIVE WRITING is a high bar (Pennebaker effects)
- Shame-proneness as a moderator consideration
Traps
Don't reduce this to 'journaling helps' — the comparison shows HOW you write to yourself matters, not just that you write.
Questions to bring to class
- Connect to the three paradoxes: which one does compassionate writing target most directly?
- Your course journal is not this manipulation — but which ingredients does it share?
General permission that applies to every paper: you are allowed to skim the statistics you haven't learned yet. Extract the design and the direction of findings; let the Greek letters wash over you. The exam tests design logic and findings, never decimals.